Every startup founder eventually sits down, opens a spreadsheet, and does the math they've been avoiding. How long does the money last? The answer comes from two numbers: your burn rate and your runway. Get these right and you can plan. Get them wrong — or ignore them — and you can't.
Real Numbers from a Real Scenario
Priya Nair, 31, co-founded a B2B SaaS platform in Austin with $2.4 million in seed funding. Their monthly expenses — two engineers, one designer, one sales hire, office space, and SaaS tools — came to $118,000 per month gross. Monthly recurring revenue was sitting at $23,500. That put their net burn at $94,500 and their runway at about 25.4 months.
Sound comfortable? Here's what changed the math: they decided to hire three more engineers to accelerate the product roadmap. Gross burn jumped to $181,000. Revenue didn't move immediately. Net burn hit $157,500, and runway collapsed from 25.4 months to 15.2 months. Not terrible, but suddenly the fundraising conversation that felt optional became time-sensitive. Knowing those numbers in advance meant they could plan intentionally instead of scrambling.
What a Healthy Burn Rate Looks Like
There's no universal "good" burn rate. Context is everything. A pre-revenue biotech startup burning $200,000 per month might be completely rational given 10-year development timelines. A two-year-old SaaS company with the same burn and $40,000 in MRR has a problem.
The metric most investors focus on alongside burn is burn multiple: how many dollars are you burning for every dollar of net new ARR added? A burn multiple below 1.5x is considered efficient. Between 1.5x and 3x is acceptable. Above 3x gets harder to defend at the Series A and beyond. But even burn multiple norms shift with market conditions — what VCs considered efficient in 2021 looked different by 2023.
What matters most is the trajectory. Burn going down while revenue goes up is the story you want to tell. Burn going up while revenue stays flat is the story that ends fundraising conversations early.
When to Cut Burn vs. Raise Revenue
This is the tension at the heart of every startup. Cut burn too aggressively and you gut the team or slow the product, making the next funding round harder. Don't cut enough and you run out of cash before proving the model.
Because startups are fundamentally in a race, the real question is: what's your most constrained resource right now? If the bottleneck is engineering velocity, adding burn for engineering talent might be the right call. If you have a product people want but can't acquire customers efficiently, marketing spend may be the lever. But if revenue growth has stalled and you don't know why, spending your way through the problem rarely works.
A useful mental test: if you added $30,000 per month in burn today, what specific outcome would you expect in 90 days, and how confident are you? If you can't answer that clearly, the spend probably isn't worth it.